BAD CAT vs Blood Zone [2X]
Blood Zone [2X] currently leads with 3,150 concurrent players against 1,695, a 1.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Blood Zone [2X] at 4,252 concurrent players, versus 3,185. Momentum favours Blood Zone [2X]: +66.5% week over week versus +10.6% for BAD CAT. Lifetime, BAD CAT has more visits (371.2M vs 29M). Full side-by-side history for BAD CAT and Blood Zone [2X] is charted above.
BAD CAT
1,695
playing now
3,185 24h peak · 371.2M visits
VS
Blood Zone [💸2X]
3,150
playing now
4,105 24h peak · 29M visits
Player count history
BAD CATBlood Zone [2X]
Head to head
| Metric | BAD CAT | Blood Zone [2X] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,695 | 3,150 | 1,455 (1.9×) |
| 24h peak | 3,185 | 4,105 | 920 |
| 24h average | 1,949 | 3,141 | 1,192 (1.6×) |
| 7-day peak | 3,185 | 4,252 | 1,067 |
| 7-day average | 1,422 | 2,984 | 1,562 (2.1×) |
| 30-day peak | 3,185 | 4,252 | 1,067 |
| All-time peak | 3,185 | 4,252 | 1,067 |
| 24h change | ▲ 13.0% | ▼ 5.9% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 10.6% | ▲ 66.5% | — |
| Total visits | 371.2M | 29M | 342.3M (12.8×) |
| Visits (24h) | 255.9K | 230.3K | 25.7K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.3M | 1.6M | 333.4K |
| Favorites | 1.1M | 109.3K | 992.6K (10.1×) |
| Rating | 86.5% | 79.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #967 | #546 | of 8,009 |
| Trending score | 119.9 | 18.3 | — |
| Created | Aug 30, 2021 | Jul 4, 2023 | — |
| Genre | Roleplay & Avatar Sim | Shooter | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for BAD CAT, 13 for Blood Zone [2X].