BAD CAT vs [] MOUNT RNG

[] MOUNT RNG currently leads with 2,291 concurrent players against 1,674. On all-time peak the record belongs to [] MOUNT RNG at 2,315 concurrent players, versus 2,148. Lifetime, BAD CAT has more visits (369.7M vs 68.7M). Full side-by-side history for BAD CAT and [] MOUNT RNG is charted above.

BAD CAT
1,674
playing now
2,148 24h peak Β· 369.7M visits
VS
[🐲] MOUNT RNG
2,291
playing now
2,290 24h peak Β· 68.7M visits

Player count history

BAD CAT[] MOUNT RNG

Head to head

Metric BAD CAT [] MOUNT RNGDifference
Playing now1,6742,291617
24h peak2,1482,290142
24h average1,5652,037472
7-day peak2,1482,315167
7-day average1,2731,985712 (1.6Γ—)
30-day peak2,1482,315167
All-time peak2,1482,315167
24h changeβ–² 28.9%β–Ό 1.3%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits369.7M68.7M301.1M (5.4Γ—)
Visits (24h)173.4K113.2K60.2K (1.5Γ—)
Visits (7d)396.4K442.5K46.1K
Favorites1.1M129.8K965.4K (8.4Γ—)
Rating86.5%95.5%β€”
Global rank (players)#822#665of 4,425
Trending score71.98.6β€”
CreatedAug 30, 2021Aug 25, 2024β€”
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for BAD CAT, 5 for [] MOUNT RNG.

BAD CAT vs [] MOUNT RNG β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals