[UPD] SharkBite Classic vs Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower

Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower currently leads with 1,613 concurrent players against 548, a 2.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower at 4,443 concurrent players, versus 1,460. Momentum favours [UPD] SharkBite Classic: -8.9% week over week versus -18.8% for Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower. Lifetime, [UPD] SharkBite Classic has more visits (1.7B vs 21.6M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] SharkBite Classic and Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower is charted above.

[UPD🥳] SharkBite Classic 🦈
548
playing now
1,124 24h peak · 1.7B visits
VS
Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower 💃
1,613
playing now
2,960 24h peak · 21.6M visits

Player count history

[UPD] SharkBite ClassicWould You Rather: Emote Testing Tower

Head to head

Metric [UPD] SharkBite Classic Would You Rather: Emote Testing TowerDifference
Playing now5481,6131,065 (2.9×)
24h peak1,1242,9601,836 (2.6×)
24h average6921,9501,258 (2.8×)
7-day peak1,3763,5572,181 (2.6×)
7-day average7452,1421,397 (2.9×)
30-day peak1,3764,4433,067 (3.2×)
All-time peak1,4604,4432,983 (3.0×)
24h change 1.4% 10.0%
7d change 8.9% 18.8%
Total visits1.7B21.6M1.6B (76.8×)
Visits (24h)91.1K329K237.9K (3.6×)
Visits (7d)647.8K2.4M1.8M (3.8×)
Favorites5.1M1.9M3.2M (2.6×)
Rating89.6%84.9%
Global rank (players)#1,925#968of 8,009
Trending score-19.6-29.2
CreatedApr 10, 2017Apr 13, 2026
GenreSurvivalObby & Platformer

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for [UPD] SharkBite Classic, 13 for Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower.