[UPD] SharkBite Classic vs Build to Defend Loot

Build to Defend Loot currently leads with 3,993 concurrent players against 1,107, a 3.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Defend Loot at 3,993 concurrent players, versus 1,460. Momentum favours Build to Defend Loot: +6.2% week over week versus -6.4% for [UPD] SharkBite Classic. Lifetime, [UPD] SharkBite Classic has more visits (1.7B vs 112.3M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] SharkBite Classic and Build to Defend Loot is charted above.

[UPD🥳] SharkBite Classic 🦈
1,107
playing now
1,134 24h peak · 1.7B visits
VS
⚔️Build to Defend Loot
3,993
playing now
3,369 24h peak · 112.3M visits

Player count history

[UPD] SharkBite ClassicBuild to Defend Loot

Head to head

Metric [UPD] SharkBite Classic Build to Defend LootDifference
Playing now1,1073,9932,886 (3.6×)
24h peak1,1343,3692,235 (3.0×)
24h average9052,2641,359 (2.5×)
7-day peak1,3763,3691,993 (2.4×)
7-day average7762,0881,312 (2.7×)
30-day peak1,3763,3691,993 (2.4×)
All-time peak1,4603,9932,533 (2.7×)
24h change 27.1% 10.9%
7d change 6.4% 6.2%
Total visits1.7B112.3M1.6B (14.8×)
Visits (24h)91.6K294.4K202.8K (3.2×)
Visits (7d)639.5K2M1.4M (3.1×)
Favorites5.1M97.4K5M (52.5×)
Rating89.6%87.2%
Global rank (players)#1,481#626of 8,283
Trending score47.728.0
CreatedApr 10, 2017Jan 3, 2026
GenreSurvivalSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for [UPD] SharkBite Classic, 12 for Build to Defend Loot.