[UPD] SharkBite Classic vs [UPD] Neo Tennis
[UPD] Neo Tennis currently leads with 2,208 concurrent players against 1,099, a 2.0× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD] Neo Tennis at 3,181 concurrent players, versus 1,460. Momentum favours [UPD] Neo Tennis: +6.5% week over week versus -6.2% for [UPD] SharkBite Classic. Lifetime, [UPD] SharkBite Classic has more visits (1.7B vs 228.3M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] SharkBite Classic and [UPD] Neo Tennis is charted above.
[UPD🥳] SharkBite Classic 🦈
1,099
playing now
1,124 24h peak · 1.7B visits
VS
[UPD] Neo Tennis
2,208
playing now
2,599 24h peak · 228.3M visits
Player count history
[UPD] SharkBite Classic[UPD] Neo Tennis
Head to head
| Metric | [UPD] SharkBite Classic | [UPD] Neo Tennis | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,099 | 2,208 | 1,109 (2.0×) |
| 24h peak | 1,124 | 2,599 | 1,475 (2.3×) |
| 24h average | 890 | 2,161 | 1,271 (2.4×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,376 | 2,599 | 1,223 (1.9×) |
| 7-day average | 775 | 1,672 | 897 (2.2×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,376 | 2,777 | 1,401 (2.0×) |
| All-time peak | 1,460 | 3,181 | 1,721 (2.2×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 25.2% | ▲ 46.8% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 6.2% | ▲ 6.5% | — |
| Total visits | 1.7B | 228.3M | 1.4B (7.3×) |
| Visits (24h) | 92.3K | 371.4K | 279.1K (4.0×) |
| Visits (7d) | 641.5K | 2.1M | 1.5M (3.3×) |
| Favorites | 5.1M | 4.4M | 687.6K |
| Rating | 89.6% | 90.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,486 | #908 | of 8,284 |
| Trending score | 42.5 | 96.2 | — |
| Created | Apr 10, 2017 | Jul 17, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Sports & Racing | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for [UPD] SharkBite Classic, 13 for [UPD] Neo Tennis.