[UPD] SharkBite Classic vs Build to Survive [TESTING]
Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 6,607 concurrent players against 1,061, a 6.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 1,460. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +8.2% week over week versus -6.4% for [UPD] SharkBite Classic. Lifetime, [UPD] SharkBite Classic has more visits (1.7B vs 268.8M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] SharkBite Classic and Build to Survive [TESTING] is charted above.
Player count history
Head to head
| Metric | [UPD] SharkBite Classic | Build to Survive [TESTING] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,061 | 6,607 | 5,546 (6.2×) |
| 24h peak | 1,134 | 6,794 | 5,660 (6.0×) |
| 24h average | 904 | 5,716 | 4,812 (6.3×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,376 | 6,968 | 5,592 (5.1×) |
| 7-day average | 776 | 5,135 | 4,359 (6.6×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,376 | 6,968 | 5,592 (5.1×) |
| All-time peak | 1,460 | 7,729 | 6,269 (5.3×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 27.0% | ▲ 14.8% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 6.4% | ▲ 8.2% | — |
| Total visits | 1.7B | 268.8M | 1.4B (6.2×) |
| Visits (24h) | 90.6K | 457.9K | 367.3K (5.1×) |
| Visits (7d) | 638.5K | 3.2M | 2.5M (5.0×) |
| Favorites | 5.1M | 5.6M | 488.4K |
| Rating | 89.6% | 96.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,531 | #306 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 47.3 | 42.3 | — |
| Created | Apr 10, 2017 | Aug 12, 2021 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for [UPD] SharkBite Classic, 12 for Build to Survive [TESTING].