[UPD] SharkBite Classic vs Mermaid Testing
Mermaid Testing currently leads with 3,219 concurrent players against 711, a 4.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Mermaid Testing at 3,501 concurrent players, versus 1,460. Momentum favours Mermaid Testing: +16.2% week over week versus -8.3% for [UPD] SharkBite Classic. Lifetime, [UPD] SharkBite Classic has more visits (1.7B vs 681.2M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] SharkBite Classic and Mermaid Testing is charted above.
[UPD🥳] SharkBite Classic 🦈
711
playing now
1,124 24h peak · 1.7B visits
VS
Mermaid Testing 🥭
3,219
playing now
3,501 24h peak · 681.2M visits
Player count history
[UPD] SharkBite ClassicMermaid Testing
Head to head
| Metric | [UPD] SharkBite Classic | Mermaid Testing | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 711 | 3,219 | 2,508 (4.5×) |
| 24h peak | 1,124 | 3,501 | 2,377 (3.1×) |
| 24h average | 719 | 2,641 | 1,922 (3.7×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,376 | 3,501 | 2,125 (2.5×) |
| 7-day average | 749 | 2,030 | 1,281 (2.7×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,376 | 3,501 | 2,125 (2.5×) |
| All-time peak | 1,460 | 3,501 | 2,041 (2.4×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 2.7% | ▲ 24.8% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 8.3% | ▲ 16.2% | — |
| Total visits | 1.7B | 681.2M | 981.4M (2.4×) |
| Visits (24h) | 90.3K | 406.3K | 316.1K (4.5×) |
| Visits (7d) | 646.4K | 2.2M | 1.6M (3.5×) |
| Favorites | 5.1M | 534.7K | 4.6M (9.6×) |
| Rating | 89.6% | 77.7% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,910 | #618 | of 8,197 |
| Trending score | -11.1 | 101.8 | — |
| Created | Apr 10, 2017 | Oct 21, 2020 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Roleplay & Avatar Sim | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for [UPD] SharkBite Classic, 12 for Mermaid Testing.