[UPD] SharkBite Classic vs Animal Simulator

Animal Simulator currently leads with 3,246 concurrent players against 827, a 3.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Animal Simulator at 5,531 concurrent players, versus 1,460. Momentum favours Animal Simulator: +1.3% week over week versus -11.8% for [UPD] SharkBite Classic. Lifetime, [UPD] SharkBite Classic has more visits (1.7B vs 1.6B). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] SharkBite Classic and Animal Simulator is charted above.

[UPD🥳] SharkBite Classic 🦈
827
playing now
1,146 24h peak · 1.7B visits
VS
Animal Simulator
3,246
playing now
5,008 24h peak · 1.6B visits

Player count history

[UPD] SharkBite ClassicAnimal Simulator

Head to head

Metric [UPD] SharkBite Classic Animal SimulatorDifference
Playing now8273,2462,419 (3.9×)
24h peak1,1465,0083,862 (4.4×)
24h average8223,7222,900 (4.5×)
7-day peak1,1485,0083,860 (4.4×)
7-day average7423,7643,022 (5.1×)
30-day peak1,2145,0083,794 (4.1×)
All-time peak1,4605,5314,071 (3.8×)
24h change 12.0% 2.2%
7d change 11.8% 1.3%
Total visits1.7B1.6B90M
Visits (24h)90.8K314.6K223.8K (3.5×)
Visits (7d)629.8K2.2M1.6M (3.5×)
Favorites5.1M1.8M3.3M (2.8×)
Rating89.6%83.6%
Global rank (players)#1,434#462of 8,339
Trending score30.5-4.0
CreatedApr 10, 2017Sep 20, 2020
GenreSurvivalRoleplay & Avatar Sim

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for [UPD] SharkBite Classic, 14 for Animal Simulator.