[UPD] SharkBite Classic vs Combat Warriors
Combat Warriors currently leads with 2,205 concurrent players against 461, a 4.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Combat Warriors at 3,193 concurrent players, versus 1,460. Momentum favours Combat Warriors: -1.6% week over week versus -9.5% for [UPD] SharkBite Classic. Lifetime, [UPD] SharkBite Classic has more visits (1.7B vs 1.4B). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] SharkBite Classic and Combat Warriors is charted above.
[UPD🥳] SharkBite Classic 🦈
461
playing now
1,124 24h peak · 1.7B visits
VS
Combat Warriors
2,205
playing now
3,116 24h peak · 1.4B visits
Player count history
[UPD] SharkBite ClassicCombat Warriors
Head to head
| Metric | [UPD] SharkBite Classic | Combat Warriors | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 461 | 2,205 | 1,744 (4.8×) |
| 24h peak | 1,124 | 3,116 | 1,992 (2.8×) |
| 24h average | 675 | 2,504 | 1,829 (3.7×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,376 | 3,179 | 1,803 (2.3×) |
| 7-day average | 742 | 2,400 | 1,658 (3.2×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,376 | 3,179 | 1,803 (2.3×) |
| All-time peak | 1,460 | 3,193 | 1,733 (2.2×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 4.0% | ▲ 2.9% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 9.5% | ▼ 1.6% | — |
| Total visits | 1.7B | 1.4B | 217.8M |
| Visits (24h) | 90.6K | 233.4K | 142.8K (2.6×) |
| Visits (7d) | 648.2K | 1.6M | 932.2K (2.4×) |
| Favorites | 5.1M | 2.4M | 2.8M (2.2×) |
| Rating | 89.6% | 83.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,104 | #736 | of 8,017 |
| Trending score | -24.8 | 14.6 | — |
| Created | Apr 10, 2017 | Nov 3, 2019 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Action | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for [UPD] SharkBite Classic, 13 for Combat Warriors.