[UPD] SharkBite Classic vs [X2] Freeze for UGC
[X2] Freeze for UGC currently leads with 2,356 concurrent players against 920, a 2.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [X2] Freeze for UGC at 6,305 concurrent players, versus 1,460. Momentum favours [X2] Freeze for UGC: -5.3% week over week versus -7.2% for [UPD] SharkBite Classic. Lifetime, [UPD] SharkBite Classic has more visits (1.7B vs 24.1M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] SharkBite Classic and [X2] Freeze for UGC is charted above.
[UPD🥳] SharkBite Classic 🦈
920
playing now
1,124 24h peak · 1.7B visits
VS
[X2] Freeze for UGC 🧊
2,356
playing now
3,814 24h peak · 24.1M visits
Player count history
[UPD] SharkBite Classic[X2] Freeze for UGC
Head to head
| Metric | [UPD] SharkBite Classic | [X2] Freeze for UGC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 920 | 2,356 | 1,436 (2.6×) |
| 24h peak | 1,124 | 3,814 | 2,690 (3.4×) |
| 24h average | 775 | 2,699 | 1,924 (3.5×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,376 | 4,037 | 2,661 (2.9×) |
| 7-day average | 765 | 2,542 | 1,777 (3.3×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,376 | 4,815 | 3,439 (3.5×) |
| All-time peak | 1,460 | 6,305 | 4,845 (4.3×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 11.7% | ▲ 3.4% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 7.2% | ▼ 5.3% | — |
| Total visits | 1.7B | 24.1M | 1.6B (69.1×) |
| Visits (24h) | 86.1K | 425.5K | 339.3K (4.9×) |
| Visits (7d) | 647.2K | 2.7M | 2M (4.1×) |
| Favorites | 5.1M | 231.7K | 4.9M (22.1×) |
| Rating | 89.6% | 79.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,589 | #769 | of 7,928 |
| Trending score | 3.7 | 21.0 | — |
| Created | Apr 10, 2017 | Jun 21, 2024 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Obby & Platformer | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for [UPD] SharkBite Classic, 13 for [X2] Freeze for UGC.