[UPD] SharkBite Classic vs Iron Man: Reimagined
Iron Man: Reimagined currently leads with 2,384 concurrent players against 1,008, a 2.4× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Iron Man: Reimagined at 2,966 concurrent players, versus 1,460. Momentum favours Iron Man: Reimagined: +17.2% week over week versus -5.4% for [UPD] SharkBite Classic. Lifetime, [UPD] SharkBite Classic has more visits (1.7B vs 109.3M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] SharkBite Classic and Iron Man: Reimagined is charted above.
[UPD🥳] SharkBite Classic 🦈
1,008
playing now
1,024 24h peak · 1.7B visits
VS
Iron Man: Reimagined
2,384
playing now
2,678 24h peak · 109.3M visits
Player count history
[UPD] SharkBite ClassicIron Man: Reimagined
Head to head
| Metric | [UPD] SharkBite Classic | Iron Man: Reimagined | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,008 | 2,384 | 1,376 (2.4×) |
| 24h peak | 1,024 | 2,678 | 1,654 (2.6×) |
| 24h average | 758 | 2,141 | 1,383 (2.8×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,376 | 2,678 | 1,302 (1.9×) |
| 7-day average | 773 | 1,856 | 1,083 (2.4×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,376 | 2,678 | 1,302 (1.9×) |
| All-time peak | 1,460 | 2,966 | 1,506 (2.0×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 8.6% | ▲ 35.7% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 5.4% | ▲ 17.2% | — |
| Total visits | 1.7B | 109.3M | 1.6B (15.2×) |
| Visits (24h) | 82.3K | 296.6K | 214.3K (3.6×) |
| Visits (7d) | 651.9K | 2M | 1.3M (3.1×) |
| Favorites | 5.1M | 271.2K | 4.8M (18.9×) |
| Rating | 89.6% | 91.0% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,531 | #814 | of 7,866 |
| Trending score | -5.4 | 50.5 | — |
| Created | Apr 10, 2017 | Mar 29, 2024 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Action | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for [UPD] SharkBite Classic, 12 for Iron Man: Reimagined.