[UPD] SharkBite Classic vs [X4 LUCK] MOUNT RNG

[X4 LUCK] MOUNT RNG currently leads with 4,958 concurrent players against 957, a 5.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [X4 LUCK] MOUNT RNG at 5,615 concurrent players, versus 1,460. Momentum favours [X4 LUCK] MOUNT RNG: +77.1% week over week versus -8.0% for [UPD] SharkBite Classic. Lifetime, [UPD] SharkBite Classic has more visits (1.7B vs 70.7M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] SharkBite Classic and [X4 LUCK] MOUNT RNG is charted above.

[UPD🥳] SharkBite Classic 🦈
957
playing now
1,124 24h peak · 1.7B visits
VS
[X4 LUCK🍀][🐲] MOUNT RNG
4,958
playing now
5,199 24h peak · 70.7M visits

Player count history

[UPD] SharkBite Classic[X4 LUCK] MOUNT RNG

Head to head

Metric [UPD] SharkBite Classic [X4 LUCK] MOUNT RNGDifference
Playing now9574,9584,001 (5.2×)
24h peak1,1245,1994,075 (4.6×)
24h average7794,8104,031 (6.2×)
7-day peak1,3765,5354,159 (4.0×)
7-day average7553,6092,854 (4.8×)
30-day peak1,3765,5354,159 (4.0×)
All-time peak1,4605,6154,155 (3.8×)
24h change 10.7% 19.6%
7d change 8.0% 77.1%
Total visits1.7B70.7M1.6B (23.5×)
Visits (24h)89.3K323.3K234K (3.6×)
Visits (7d)642.3K1.8M1.1M (2.8×)
Favorites5.1M133.1K5M (38.5×)
Rating89.6%95.5%
Global rank (players)#1,593#419of 8,197
Trending score8.9121.7
CreatedApr 10, 2017Aug 25, 2024
GenreSurvivalSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for [UPD] SharkBite Classic, 13 for [X4 LUCK] MOUNT RNG.