[UPD] SharkBite Classic vs [THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG

[UPD] SharkBite Classic currently leads with 747 concurrent players against 489, a 1.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG at 3,249 concurrent players, versus 1,460. Momentum favours [UPD] SharkBite Classic: -7.3% week over week versus -19.5% for [THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG. Lifetime, [UPD] SharkBite Classic has more visits (1.7B vs 24.8M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] SharkBite Classic and [THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG is charted above.

[UPD🥳] SharkBite Classic 🦈
747
playing now
1,124 24h peak · 1.7B visits
VS
[⛈️THUNDERSTORM]🎲 EMOTE RNG
489
playing now
2,773 24h peak · 24.8M visits

Player count history

[UPD] SharkBite Classic[THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG

Head to head

Metric [UPD] SharkBite Classic [THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNGDifference
Playing now747489258 (1.5×)
24h peak1,1242,7731,649 (2.5×)
24h average781635146
7-day peak1,3762,7731,397 (2.0×)
7-day average765512253
30-day peak1,3762,7731,397 (2.0×)
All-time peak1,4603,2491,789 (2.2×)
24h change 12.4% 49.8%
7d change 7.3% 19.5%
Total visits1.7B24.8M1.6B (67.0×)
Visits (24h)87.6K55.8K31.8K (1.6×)
Visits (7d)647.5K299.4K348.1K (2.2×)
Favorites5.1M37.6K5.1M (136.0×)
Rating89.6%88.2%
Global rank (players)#1,684#2,125of 7,929
Trending score5.964.3
CreatedApr 10, 2017Aug 1, 2025
GenreSurvivalSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for [UPD] SharkBite Classic, 13 for [THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG.