[UPD] SharkBite Classic vs Roll to Defend

Roll to Defend currently leads with 855 concurrent players against 676. On all-time peak the record belongs to Roll to Defend at 1,563 concurrent players, versus 1,214. Lifetime, [UPD] SharkBite Classic has more visits (1.7B vs 13.6M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] SharkBite Classic and Roll to Defend is charted above.

[UPDπŸ₯³] SharkBite Classic 🦈
676
playing now
1,061 24h peak Β· 1.7B visits
VS
Roll to Defend
855
playing now
1,096 24h peak Β· 13.6M visits

Player count history

[UPD] SharkBite ClassicRoll to Defend

Head to head

Metric [UPD] SharkBite Classic Roll to DefendDifference
Playing now676855179
24h peak1,0611,09635
24h average694882188
7-day peak1,2141,563349
7-day average8001,151351
30-day peak1,2141,563349
All-time peak1,2141,563349
24h changeβ–Ό 6.5%β–Ό 13.6%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits1.7B13.6M1.6B (122.5Γ—)
Visits (24h)86.8K69.2K17.6K
Visits (7d)336.1K318.6K17.5K
Favorites5.1M28.9K5.1M (177.0Γ—)
Rating89.6%95.8%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,665#1,488of 4,576
Trending score-36.6-67.5β€”
CreatedApr 10, 2017May 14, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for [UPD] SharkBite Classic, 5 for Roll to Defend.

[UPD] SharkBite Classic vs Roll to Defend β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals