[UPD] SharkBite Classic vs Build To Survive DISASTERS!
Build To Survive DISASTERS! currently leads with 2,259 concurrent players against 575, a 3.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build To Survive DISASTERS! at 4,824 concurrent players, versus 1,460. Momentum favours [UPD] SharkBite Classic: -8.6% week over week versus -22.4% for Build To Survive DISASTERS!. Lifetime, [UPD] SharkBite Classic has more visits (1.7B vs 35.2M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] SharkBite Classic and Build To Survive DISASTERS! is charted above.
Player count history
Head to head
| Metric | [UPD] SharkBite Classic | Build To Survive DISASTERS! | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 575 | 2,259 | 1,684 (3.9×) |
| 24h peak | 1,124 | 3,566 | 2,442 (3.2×) |
| 24h average | 723 | 2,582 | 1,859 (3.6×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,376 | 3,937 | 2,561 (2.9×) |
| 7-day average | 752 | 2,431 | 1,679 (3.2×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,376 | 3,991 | 2,615 (2.9×) |
| All-time peak | 1,460 | 4,824 | 3,364 (3.3×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 3.0% | ▲ 8.6% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 8.6% | ▼ 22.4% | — |
| Total visits | 1.7B | 35.2M | 1.6B (47.2×) |
| Visits (24h) | 90.3K | 239K | 148.8K (2.6×) |
| Visits (7d) | 648.3K | 1.6M | 911.6K (2.4×) |
| Favorites | 5.1M | 993.1K | 4.1M (5.2×) |
| Rating | 89.6% | 95.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,871 | #704 | of 8,019 |
| Trending score | -10.7 | 21.0 | — |
| Created | Apr 10, 2017 | May 24, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for [UPD] SharkBite Classic, 12 for Build To Survive DISASTERS!.