[UPD] SharkBite Classic vs [UPD] Cut a Gem

[UPD] SharkBite Classic currently leads with 1,084 concurrent players against 930. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD] Cut a Gem at 4,114 concurrent players, versus 1,460. Momentum favours [UPD] SharkBite Classic: -6.4% week over week versus -21.6% for [UPD] Cut a Gem. Lifetime, [UPD] SharkBite Classic has more visits (1.7B vs 11M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] SharkBite Classic and [UPD] Cut a Gem is charted above.

[UPDπŸ₯³] SharkBite Classic 🦈
1,084
playing now
1,146 24h peak Β· 1.7B visits
VS
[πŸ”₯UPD] Cut a Gem
930
playing now
1,352 24h peak Β· 11M visits

Player count history

[UPD] SharkBite Classic[UPD] Cut a Gem

Head to head

Metric [UPD] SharkBite Classic [UPD] Cut a GemDifference
Playing now1,084930154
24h peak1,1461,352206
24h average9171,087170
7-day peak1,2751,865590
7-day average7781,219441 (1.6Γ—)
30-day peak1,2752,191916 (1.7Γ—)
All-time peak1,4604,1142,654 (2.8Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 28.6%β–Ό 18.0%β€”
7d changeβ–Ό 6.4%β–Ό 21.6%β€”
Total visits1.7B11M1.7B (151.7Γ—)
Visits (24h)92.2K97.5K5.4K
Visits (7d)638.2K787.7K149.5K
Favorites5.1M372K4.7M (13.8Γ—)
Rating89.6%97.4%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,447#1,586of 8,283
Trending score51.4-32.3β€”
CreatedApr 10, 2017May 23, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 13 days for [UPD] SharkBite Classic, 13 for [UPD] Cut a Gem.