[UPD] SharkBite Classic vs Speed Training

Speed Training currently leads with 1,031 concurrent players against 442, a 2.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Speed Training at 1,534 concurrent players, versus 1,214. Lifetime, [UPD] SharkBite Classic has more visits (1.7B vs 10.2M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] SharkBite Classic and Speed Training is charted above.

[UPD🥳] SharkBite Classic 🦈
442
playing now
1,061 24h peak · 1.7B visits
VS
Speed Trainingâš¡
1,031
playing now
1,363 24h peak · 10.2M visits

Player count history

[UPD] SharkBite ClassicSpeed Training

Head to head

Metric [UPD] SharkBite Classic Speed TrainingDifference
Playing now4421,031589 (2.3×)
24h peak1,0611,363302
24h average6741,098424 (1.6×)
7-day peak1,2141,525311
7-day average8001,221421 (1.5×)
30-day peak1,2141,525311
All-time peak1,2141,534320
24h change▼ 0.3%▼ 16.5%—
7d change———
Total visits1.7B10.2M1.7B (162.2×)
Visits (24h)89.1K78.3K10.8K
Visits (7d)325K309K16.1K
Favorites5.1M439.3K4.7M (11.7×)
Rating89.6%95.6%—
Global rank (players)#1,789#1,184of 4,425
Trending score-43.3-30.1—
CreatedApr 10, 2017Jun 2, 2026—
GenreSurvivalSimulation—

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for [UPD] SharkBite Classic, 5 for Speed Training.

[UPD] SharkBite Classic vs Speed Training — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals