Build to Survive! vs 100 Waves Later

Build to Survive! currently leads with 886 concurrent players against 566, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive! at 1,004 concurrent players, versus 803. Lifetime, Build to Survive! has more visits (768.3M vs 58.3M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive! and 100 Waves Later is charted above.

Build to Survive!
886
playing now
1,003 24h peak · 768.3M visits
VS
100 Waves Later
566
playing now
626 24h peak · 58.3M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive!100 Waves Later

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive! 100 Waves LaterDifference
Playing now886566320 (1.6×)
24h peak1,003626377 (1.6×)
24h average763472291 (1.6×)
7-day peak1,003803200
7-day average743493250 (1.5×)
30-day peak1,003803200
All-time peak1,004803201
24h change 5.5% 2.5%
7d change 1.0%
Total visits768.3M58.3M710M (13.2×)
Visits (24h)58.6K45K13.6K
Visits (7d)169.5K368.5K199K (2.2×)
Favorites688K253.2K434.8K (2.7×)
Rating80.8%98.3%
Global rank (players)#1,455#1,861of 7,060
Trending score7.5-10.9
CreatedAug 14, 2021Nov 14, 2025
GenreSurvivalSurvival

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Build to Survive!, 10 for 100 Waves Later.

Build to Survive! vs 100 Waves Later — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals