Build to Survive! vs [NEW] RH RANDOM DANCE (GTS)

[NEW] RH RANDOM DANCE (GTS) currently leads with 1,348 concurrent players against 868, a 1.6Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [NEW] RH RANDOM DANCE (GTS) at 1,422 concurrent players, versus 1,004. Lifetime, Build to Survive! has more visits (768.3M vs 1.3M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive! and [NEW] RH RANDOM DANCE (GTS) is charted above.

Build to Survive!
868
playing now
1,003 24h peak Β· 768.3M visits
VS
🚦 [NEW] RH RANDOM DANCE (GTS)
1,348
playing now
1,422 24h peak Β· 1.3M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive![NEW] RH RANDOM DANCE (GTS)

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive! [NEW] RH RANDOM DANCE (GTS)Difference
Playing now8681,348480 (1.6Γ—)
24h peak1,0031,422419
24h average7641,158394 (1.5Γ—)
7-day peak1,0031,422419
7-day average7431,080337
30-day peak1,0031,422419
All-time peak1,0041,422418
24h changeβ–² 4.9%β–² 21.4%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits768.3M1.3M767M (596.0Γ—)
Visits (24h)57.5K138.1K80.6K (2.4Γ—)
Visits (7d)165.6K405.1K239.5K (2.4Γ—)
Favorites688K11.7K676.4K (59.0Γ—)
Rating80.8%89.9%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,493#1,126of 7,060
Trending score7.921.6β€”
CreatedAug 14, 2021Jun 10, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalEntertainmentβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for Build to Survive!, 4 for [NEW] RH RANDOM DANCE (GTS).

Build to Survive! vs [NEW] RH RANDOM DANCE (GTS) β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals