Build to Survive! vs Would You Rather: Animal Hospital Outfit Tower

Build to Survive! currently leads with 819 concurrent players against 170, a 4.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Would You Rather: Animal Hospital Outfit Tower at 1,050 concurrent players, versus 1,030. Lifetime, Build to Survive! has more visits (768.4M vs 1.3M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive! and Would You Rather: Animal Hospital Outfit Tower is charted above.

Build to Survive!
819
playing now
1,030 24h peak · 768.4M visits
VS
Would You Rather: Animal Hospital Outfit Tower
170
playing now
224 24h peak · 1.3M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive!Would You Rather: Animal Hospital Outfit Tower

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive! Would You Rather: Animal Hospital Outfit TowerDifference
Playing now819170649 (4.8×)
24h peak1,030224806 (4.6×)
24h average748144604 (5.2×)
7-day peak1,0301,01119
7-day average718240478 (3.0×)
30-day peak1,0301,01119
All-time peak1,0301,05020
24h change 2.7% 1.4%
7d change
Total visits768.4M1.3M767M (583.5×)
Visits (24h)62.4K31.4K30.9K (2.0×)
Visits (7d)276K297.5K21.5K
Favorites688.2K187.3K500.8K (3.7×)
Rating80.8%43.0%
Global rank (players)#1,560#3,222of 7,707
Trending score11.6-79.3
CreatedAug 14, 2021Jul 21, 2026
GenreSurvivalObby & Platformer

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 6 days for Build to Survive!, 7 for Would You Rather: Animal Hospital Outfit Tower.