Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Sonic Speed Simulator

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 6,240 concurrent players against 3,691, a 1.7Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Sonic Speed Simulator at 7,044 concurrent players, versus 6,813. Lifetime, Sonic Speed Simulator has more visits (1.5B vs 265.2M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Sonic Speed Simulator is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
6,240
playing now
6,813 24h peak Β· 265.2M visits
VS
Sonic Speed Simulator
3,691
playing now
7,044 24h peak Β· 1.5B visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Sonic Speed Simulator

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Sonic Speed SimulatorDifference
Playing now6,2403,6912,549 (1.7Γ—)
24h peak6,8137,044231
24h average5,5784,3291,249
7-day peak6,8137,044231
7-day average4,6483,6081,040
30-day peak6,8137,044231
All-time peak6,8137,044231
24h changeβ–² 13.5%β–² 23.1%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits265.2M1.5B1.2B (5.7Γ—)
Visits (24h)495.1K472.9K22.2K
Visits (7d)1.6M1.7M127.3K
Favorites5.5M3.2M2.4M (1.7Γ—)
Rating96.5%92.1%β€”
Global rank (players)#267#478of 5,050
Trending score74.672.2β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Mar 9, 2022β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 6 for Sonic Speed Simulator.

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Sonic Speed Simulator β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals