Build to Survive [TESTING] vs [PETS!] +1 Pickaxe Swing Escape

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 5,258 concurrent players against 5,033. On all-time peak the record belongs to [PETS!] +1 Pickaxe Swing Escape at 22,199 concurrent players, versus 7,729. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +13.3% week over week versus -25.4% for [PETS!] +1 Pickaxe Swing Escape. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.3M vs 57.8M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and [PETS!] +1 Pickaxe Swing Escape is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
5,258
playing now
6,297 24h peak Β· 268.3M visits
VS
[PETS!] +1 Pickaxe Swing Escape
5,033
playing now
9,980 24h peak Β· 57.8M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING][PETS!] +1 Pickaxe Swing Escape

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] [PETS!] +1 Pickaxe Swing EscapeDifference
Playing now5,2585,033225
24h peak6,2979,9803,683 (1.6Γ—)
24h average4,9775,557580
7-day peak7,55710,0742,517
7-day average5,1636,3831,220
30-day peak7,55710,0742,517
All-time peak7,72922,19914,470 (2.9Γ—)
24h changeβ–Ό 0.6%β–Ό 1.3%β€”
7d changeβ–² 13.3%β–Ό 25.4%β€”
Total visits268.3M57.8M210.5M (4.6Γ—)
Visits (24h)420.6K578.5K157.9K
Visits (7d)3.3M4.9M1.6M
Favorites5.6M88.3K5.5M (63.4Γ—)
Rating96.5%91.7%β€”
Global rank (players)#357#382of 7,866
Trending score-13.3-48.3β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jul 6, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for [PETS!] +1 Pickaxe Swing Escape.