Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Build A Soccer Squad! [2030]

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,238 concurrent players against 1,439, a 2.9Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 6,072 concurrent players, versus 2,125. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (264.6M vs 118.2M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Build A Soccer Squad! [2030] is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,238
playing now
6,072 24h peak Β· 264.6M visits
VS
Build A Soccer Squad! [2030]
1,439
playing now
1,996 24h peak Β· 118.2M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Build A Soccer Squad! [2030]

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Build A Soccer Squad! [2030]Difference
Playing now4,2381,4392,799 (2.9Γ—)
24h peak6,0721,9964,076 (3.0Γ—)
24h average4,5661,5023,064 (3.0Γ—)
7-day peak6,0722,1253,947 (2.9Γ—)
7-day average4,4261,5462,880 (2.9Γ—)
30-day peak6,0722,1253,947 (2.9Γ—)
All-time peak6,0722,1253,947 (2.9Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 8.9%β–² 1.2%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits264.6M118.2M146.4M (2.2Γ—)
Visits (24h)404.4K165.5K238.9K (2.4Γ—)
Visits (7d)1M573.7K441.1K (1.8Γ—)
Favorites5.5M101.6K5.4M (54.5Γ—)
Rating96.5%83.7%β€”
Global rank (players)#399#1,047of 4,381
Trending score11.5-8.9β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jun 3, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSports & Racingβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 5 for Build A Soccer Squad! [2030].

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Build A Soccer Squad! [2030] β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals