Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Five Nights TD 2 [Unit Evolutions]

Five Nights TD 2 [Unit Evolutions] currently leads with 4,649 concurrent players against 4,588. On all-time peak the record belongs to Five Nights TD 2 [Unit Evolutions] at 8,819 concurrent players, versus 7,729. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +16.4% week over week versus -9.7% for Five Nights TD 2 [Unit Evolutions]. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268M vs 102.1M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Five Nights TD 2 [Unit Evolutions] is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,588
playing now
6,224 24h peak Β· 268M visits
VS
Five Nights TD 2 [Unit Evolutions]
4,649
playing now
4,964 24h peak Β· 102.1M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Five Nights TD 2 [Unit Evolutions]

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Five Nights TD 2 [Unit Evolutions]Difference
Playing now4,5884,64961
24h peak6,2244,9641,260
24h average4,9434,596347
7-day peak7,5578,6291,072
7-day average5,1925,475283
30-day peak7,5578,6291,072
All-time peak7,7298,8191,090
24h changeβ–Ό 3.5%β–Ό 4.4%β€”
7d changeβ–² 16.4%β–Ό 9.7%β€”
Total visits268M102.1M165.9M (2.6Γ—)
Visits (24h)423.8K242K181.8K (1.8Γ—)
Visits (7d)3.3M2.3M1M
Favorites5.6M131.6K5.5M (42.5Γ—)
Rating96.5%95.4%β€”
Global rank (players)#357#359of 7,662
Trending score-17.6-58.5β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jun 17, 2025β€”
GenreSurvivalStrategyβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for Five Nights TD 2 [Unit Evolutions].

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Five Nights TD 2 [Unit Evolutions] β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals