Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Be a Hole

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,124 concurrent players against 1,423, a 2.9Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 6,072 concurrent players, versus 3,105. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (264.5M vs 252.6M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Be a Hole is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,124
playing now
6,072 24h peak Β· 264.5M visits
VS
πŸ•³οΈ Be a Hole
1,423
playing now
3,105 24h peak Β· 252.6M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Be a Hole

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Be a HoleDifference
Playing now4,1241,4232,701 (2.9Γ—)
24h peak6,0723,1052,967 (2.0Γ—)
24h average4,7981,9032,895 (2.5Γ—)
7-day peak6,0723,1052,967 (2.0Γ—)
7-day average4,4711,7902,681 (2.5Γ—)
30-day peak6,0723,1052,967 (2.0Γ—)
All-time peak6,0723,1052,967 (2.0Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 15.3%β–² 7.6%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits264.5M252.6M11.9M
Visits (24h)409.1K332.8K76.2K
Visits (7d)967.9K1.1M140.3K
Favorites5.5M5.4M131.6K
Rating96.5%84.9%β€”
Global rank (players)#383#1,010of 4,278
Trending score26.820.4β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jun 23, 2024β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 3 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 4 for Be a Hole.

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Be a Hole β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals