Build to Survive [TESTING] vs [X2] Freeze for UGC

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,300 concurrent players against 2,810, a 1.5Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [X2] Freeze for UGC at 6,305 concurrent players, versus 6,072. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (264.5M vs 20.9M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and [X2] Freeze for UGC is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,300
playing now
6,072 24h peak Β· 264.5M visits
VS
[X2] Freeze for UGC 🧊
2,810
playing now
4,815 24h peak Β· 20.9M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING][X2] Freeze for UGC

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] [X2] Freeze for UGCDifference
Playing now4,3002,8101,490 (1.5Γ—)
24h peak6,0724,8151,257
24h average4,8933,1751,718 (1.5Γ—)
7-day peak6,0726,13866
7-day average4,4882,7661,722 (1.6Γ—)
30-day peak6,0726,13866
All-time peak6,0726,305233
24h changeβ–² 17.1%β–² 10.6%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits264.5M20.9M243.6M (12.6Γ—)
Visits (24h)418.1K510.6K92.4K
Visits (7d)958.1K1.4M478.4K
Favorites5.5M218.7K5.3M (25.3Γ—)
Rating96.5%79.5%β€”
Global rank (players)#367#581of 4,278
Trending score33.151.3β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jun 21, 2024β€”
GenreSurvivalObby & Platformerβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 3 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 4 for [X2] Freeze for UGC.

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs [X2] Freeze for UGC β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals