Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Sorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA]

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,764 concurrent players against 4,080. On all-time peak the record belongs to Sorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA] at 7,871 concurrent players, versus 7,729. Momentum favours Sorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA]: +24.2% week over week versus +16.2% for Build to Survive [TESTING]. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268M vs 178.4M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Sorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA] is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,764
playing now
6,224 24h peak Β· 268M visits
VS
Sorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA]
4,080
playing now
7,871 24h peak Β· 178.4M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Sorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA]

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Sorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA]Difference
Playing now4,7644,080684
24h peak6,2247,8711,647
24h average4,9193,952967
7-day peak7,5577,871314
7-day average5,1862,9072,279 (1.8Γ—)
30-day peak7,5577,871314
All-time peak7,7297,871142
24h changeβ–Ό 4.0%β–² 66.2%β€”
7d changeβ–² 16.2%β–² 24.2%β€”
Total visits268M178.4M89.6M (1.5Γ—)
Visits (24h)425.2K605.9K180.7K
Visits (7d)3.3M2.6M752.5K
Favorites5.6M250K5.3M (22.4Γ—)
Rating96.5%97.2%β€”
Global rank (players)#356#433of 7,662
Trending score-18.9128.2β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jun 3, 2024β€”
GenreSurvivalStrategyβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for Sorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA].

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Sorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA] β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals