Build to Survive [TESTING] vs [UPD!] Soccer Training

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,029 concurrent players against 750, a 5.4Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 6,072 concurrent players, versus 2,130. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (264.5M vs 9.8M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and [UPD!] Soccer Training is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,029
playing now
6,072 24h peak Β· 264.5M visits
VS
[UPD!] Soccer Training⚽πŸ’₯
750
playing now
1,039 24h peak Β· 9.8M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING][UPD!] Soccer Training

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] [UPD!] Soccer TrainingDifference
Playing now4,0297503,279 (5.4Γ—)
24h peak6,0721,0395,033 (5.8Γ—)
24h average4,7378123,925 (5.8Γ—)
7-day peak6,0722,1303,942 (2.9Γ—)
7-day average4,4591,2563,203 (3.6Γ—)
30-day peak6,0722,1303,942 (2.9Γ—)
All-time peak6,0722,1303,942 (2.9Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 13.8%β–Ό 18.7%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits264.5M9.8M254.7M (27.0Γ—)
Visits (24h)416.9K62.6K354.3K (6.7Γ—)
Visits (7d)975.7K206.4K769.2K (4.7Γ—)
Favorites5.5M17.3K5.5M (319.6Γ—)
Rating96.5%96.7%β€”
Global rank (players)#389#1,443of 4,278
Trending score22.8-101.0β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Nov 9, 2023β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 3 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 3 for [UPD!] Soccer Training.

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs [UPD!] Soccer Training β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals