Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Outcome Memories v0.2

Outcome Memories v0.2 currently leads with 8,515 concurrent players against 4,606, a 1.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Outcome Memories v0.2 at 9,250 concurrent players, versus 7,729. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +13.1% week over week versus -6.4% for Outcome Memories v0.2. Lifetime, Outcome Memories v0.2 has more visits (335.1M vs 268.3M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Outcome Memories v0.2 is charted above.

Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
4,606
playing now
6,297 24h peak · 268.3M visits
VS
Outcome Memories v0.2
8,515
playing now
8,790 24h peak · 335.1M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Outcome Memories v0.2

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Outcome Memories v0.2Difference
Playing now4,6068,5153,909 (1.8×)
24h peak6,2978,7902,493
24h average4,9996,7431,744
7-day peak7,5579,2231,666
7-day average5,1625,431269
30-day peak7,5579,2231,666
All-time peak7,7299,2501,521
24h change 0.5% 38.9%
7d change 13.1% 6.4%
Total visits268.3M335.1M66.8M
Visits (24h)423.7K357.8K65.9K
Visits (7d)3.3M2.5M788.5K
Favorites5.6M496.1K5.1M (11.3×)
Rating96.5%88.1%
Global rank (players)#366#187of 7,866
Trending score-11.692.1
CreatedAug 12, 2021Aug 29, 2023
GenreSurvivalSurvival

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for Outcome Memories v0.2.