Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Catch a Brainrot

Catch a Brainrot currently leads with 4,995 concurrent players against 4,871. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 6,072 concurrent players, versus 5,548. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (264.5M vs 18.2M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Catch a Brainrot is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,871
playing now
6,072 24h peak Β· 264.5M visits
VS
Catch a Brainrot
4,995
playing now
5,078 24h peak Β· 18.2M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Catch a Brainrot

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Catch a BrainrotDifference
Playing now4,8714,995124
24h peak6,0725,078994
24h average5,0714,123948
7-day peak6,0725,548524
7-day average4,5124,085427
30-day peak6,0725,548524
All-time peak6,0725,548524
24h changeβ–² 19.6%β–² 7.0%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits264.5M18.2M246.3M (14.5Γ—)
Visits (24h)427.5K280.9K146.6K (1.5Γ—)
Visits (7d)926.2K911.8K14.4K
Favorites5.5M52.4K5.5M (105.6Γ—)
Rating96.5%89.2%β€”
Global rank (players)#331#327of 4,279
Trending score45.73.3β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021May 22, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalRPGβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 3 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 4 for Catch a Brainrot.

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Catch a Brainrot β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals