Build to Survive [TESTING] vs The Classic Soccer

The Classic Soccer currently leads with 4,748 concurrent players against 4,300. On all-time peak the record belongs to The Classic Soccer at 6,586 concurrent players, versus 6,072. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (264.5M vs 99.1M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and The Classic Soccer is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,300
playing now
6,072 24h peak Β· 264.5M visits
VS
The Classic Soccer
4,748
playing now
6,293 24h peak Β· 99.1M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]The Classic Soccer

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] The Classic SoccerDifference
Playing now4,3004,748448
24h peak6,0726,293221
24h average4,8933,0861,807 (1.6Γ—)
7-day peak6,0726,586514
7-day average4,4883,2881,200
30-day peak6,0726,586514
All-time peak6,0726,586514
24h changeβ–² 17.1%β–² 4.5%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits264.5M99.1M165.5M (2.7Γ—)
Visits (24h)418.1K224.6K193.5K (1.9Γ—)
Visits (7d)958.1K798.5K159.6K
Favorites5.5M33.3K5.5M (166.2Γ—)
Rating96.5%84.4%β€”
Global rank (players)#367#348of 4,278
Trending score33.1-21.3β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jun 5, 2023β€”
GenreSurvivalSports & Racingβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 3 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 4 for The Classic Soccer.

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs The Classic Soccer β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals