Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Silly Simon Says

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,718 concurrent players against 4,204. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 5,778. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +10.2% week over week versus -7.8% for Silly Simon Says. Lifetime, Silly Simon Says has more visits (578.8M vs 268.5M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Silly Simon Says is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,718
playing now
6,297 24h peak Β· 268.5M visits
VS
Silly Simon Says
4,204
playing now
4,954 24h peak Β· 578.8M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Silly Simon Says

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Silly Simon SaysDifference
Playing now4,7184,204514
24h peak6,2974,9541,343
24h average4,8663,902964
7-day peak7,5574,9542,603 (1.5Γ—)
7-day average5,0833,6171,466
30-day peak7,5575,0112,546 (1.5Γ—)
All-time peak7,7295,7781,951
24h changeβ–Ό 4.4%β–² 9.9%β€”
7d changeβ–² 10.2%β–Ό 7.8%β€”
Total visits268.5M578.8M310.3M (2.2Γ—)
Visits (24h)430.4K406K24.4K
Visits (7d)3.2M2.8M425.6K
Favorites5.6M624K5M (9.0Γ—)
Rating96.5%81.8%β€”
Global rank (players)#353#396of 8,019
Trending score-15.728.1β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Feb 6, 2023β€”
GenreSurvivalParty & Casualβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 12 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 13 for Silly Simon Says.