Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Digital Doom [GANGLE]

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 6,254 concurrent players against 1,398, a 4.5Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 6,813 concurrent players, versus 6,233. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (265.2M vs 1.8M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Digital Doom [GANGLE] is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
6,254
playing now
6,813 24h peak Β· 265.2M visits
VS
Digital Doom πŸŽͺ [GANGLE]
1,398
playing now
6,233 24h peak Β· 1.8M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Digital Doom [GANGLE]

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Digital Doom [GANGLE]Difference
Playing now6,2541,3984,856 (4.5Γ—)
24h peak6,8136,233580
24h average5,9132,1473,766 (2.8Γ—)
7-day peak6,8136,233580
7-day average4,7071,8672,840 (2.5Γ—)
30-day peak6,8136,233580
All-time peak6,8136,233580
24h changeβ–² 20.1%β–² 49.7%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits265.2M1.8M263.4M (144.1Γ—)
Visits (24h)496.3K265.1K231.2K (1.9Γ—)
Visits (7d)1.7M415.6K1.3M (4.0Γ—)
Favorites5.5M25.1K5.5M (220.6Γ—)
Rating96.5%91.6%β€”
Global rank (players)#252#1,011of 5,152
Trending score96.249.3β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Apr 27, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSurvivalβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 3 for Digital Doom [GANGLE].

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Digital Doom [GANGLE] β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals