Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Slap to Survive

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,316 concurrent players against 3,556. On all-time peak the record belongs to Slap to Survive at 8,673 concurrent players, versus 7,729. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +11.5% week over week versus +4.8% for Slap to Survive. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.4M vs 25.9M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Slap to Survive is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,316
playing now
6,297 24h peak Β· 268.4M visits
VS
πŸ‘‹ Slap to Survive
3,556
playing now
7,102 24h peak Β· 25.9M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Slap to Survive

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Slap to SurviveDifference
Playing now4,3163,556760
24h peak6,2977,102805
24h average4,6513,728923
7-day peak7,5577,102455
7-day average5,0914,159932
30-day peak7,5577,102455
All-time peak7,7298,673944
24h changeβ–Ό 6.3%β–Ό 15.1%β€”
7d changeβ–² 11.5%β–² 4.8%β€”
Total visits268.4M25.9M242.5M (10.4Γ—)
Visits (24h)434.1K508.3K74.2K
Visits (7d)3.3M3.8M475.1K
Favorites5.6M38.2K5.6M (146.7Γ—)
Rating96.5%90.0%β€”
Global rank (players)#397#484of 7,978
Trending score-31.6-36.8β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jun 4, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSurvivalβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for Slap to Survive.