Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Pull a Lucky Fish

Pull a Lucky Fish currently leads with 5,047 concurrent players against 4,660. On all-time peak the record belongs to Pull a Lucky Fish at 18,580 concurrent players, versus 7,729. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +11.6% week over week versus +6.4% for Pull a Lucky Fish. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.4M vs 33M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Pull a Lucky Fish is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,660
playing now
6,297 24h peak Β· 268.4M visits
VS
[🎣] Pull a Lucky Fish
5,047
playing now
18,580 24h peak Β· 33M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Pull a Lucky Fish

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Pull a Lucky FishDifference
Playing now4,6605,047387
24h peak6,29718,58012,283 (3.0Γ—)
24h average4,7185,695977
7-day peak7,55718,58011,023 (2.5Γ—)
7-day average5,1036,7031,600
30-day peak7,55718,58011,023 (2.5Γ—)
All-time peak7,72918,58010,851 (2.4Γ—)
24h changeβ–Ό 5.6%β–Ό 8.1%β€”
7d changeβ–² 11.6%β–² 6.4%β€”
Total visits268.4M33M235.3M (8.1Γ—)
Visits (24h)418.3K426K7.6K
Visits (7d)3.3M3.3M35
Favorites5.6M90.7K5.5M (61.8Γ—)
Rating96.5%95.4%β€”
Global rank (players)#371#341of 7,928
Trending score-27.6-56.3β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021May 20, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 12 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 13 for Pull a Lucky Fish.