Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Missiles vs Cities

Missiles vs Cities currently leads with 4,775 concurrent players against 4,606. On all-time peak the record belongs to Missiles vs Cities at 9,471 concurrent players, versus 7,729. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +13.1% week over week versus +8.7% for Missiles vs Cities. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.3M vs 47.5M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Missiles vs Cities is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,606
playing now
6,297 24h peak Β· 268.3M visits
VS
Missiles vs Cities
4,775
playing now
6,702 24h peak Β· 47.5M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Missiles vs Cities

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Missiles vs CitiesDifference
Playing now4,6064,775169
24h peak6,2976,702405
24h average4,9995,170171
7-day peak7,5579,4331,876
7-day average5,1625,966804
30-day peak7,5579,4331,876
All-time peak7,7299,4711,742
24h changeβ–² 0.5%β–Ό 5.2%β€”
7d changeβ–² 13.1%β–² 8.7%β€”
Total visits268.3M47.5M220.9M (5.7Γ—)
Visits (24h)423.7K444K20.3K
Visits (7d)3.3M3.9M644.7K
Favorites5.6M280.5K5.3M (20.0Γ—)
Rating96.5%98.7%β€”
Global rank (players)#366#358of 7,866
Trending score-11.6-49.4β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021May 31, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for Missiles vs Cities.