Total Football vs FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

Total Football currently leads with 1,192 concurrent players against 1,174. On all-time peak the record belongs to FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB at 1,769 concurrent players, versus 1,694. Momentum favours Total Football: +19.4% week over week versus -16.6% for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB. Lifetime, FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB has more visits (7.2M vs 3.8M). Full side-by-side history for Total Football and FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB is charted above.

Total Football ⚽
1,192
playing now
1,528 24h peak · 3.8M visits
VS
😡 FAST WAVE 😡 X99999999 ETFB
1,174
playing now
1,660 24h peak · 7.2M visits

Player count history

Total FootballFAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

Head to head

Metric Total Football FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFBDifference
Playing now1,1921,17418
24h peak1,5281,660132
24h average1,1401,15111
7-day peak1,6231,66037
7-day average1,0461,06014
30-day peak1,6231,66037
All-time peak1,6941,76975
24h change 26.7% 8.8%
7d change 19.4% 16.6%
Total visits3.8M7.2M3.4M (1.9×)
Visits (24h)207.2K179K28.2K
Visits (7d)1.3M1.1M217.6K
Favorites8.2K783.3K775.1K (95.8×)
Rating80.1%81.7%
Global rank (players)#1,243#1,295of 7,978
Trending score26.925.7
CreatedMay 4, 2026Apr 24, 2026
GenreSports & RacingSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Total Football, 10 for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB.