Ohio. vs Infinite Nights With Freddy (DOOM)
Infinite Nights With Freddy (DOOM) currently leads with 2,963 concurrent players against 1,559, a 1.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Infinite Nights With Freddy (DOOM) at 3,558 concurrent players, versus 2,053. Momentum favours Infinite Nights With Freddy (DOOM): +1.4% week over week versus -0.1% for Ohio.. Lifetime, Ohio. has more visits (325.6M vs 48.8M). Full side-by-side history for Ohio. and Infinite Nights With Freddy (DOOM) is charted above.
Ohio.
1,559
playing now
1,725 24h peak · 325.6M visits
VS
[🤫] Infinite Nights With Freddy (DOOM)
2,963
playing now
3,014 24h peak · 48.8M visits
Player count history
Ohio.Infinite Nights With Freddy (DOOM)
Head to head
| Metric | Ohio. | Infinite Nights With Freddy (DOOM) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,559 | 2,963 | 1,404 (1.9×) |
| 24h peak | 1,725 | 3,014 | 1,289 (1.7×) |
| 24h average | 1,437 | 2,616 | 1,179 (1.8×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,901 | 3,558 | 1,657 (1.9×) |
| 7-day average | 1,380 | 2,320 | 940 (1.7×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,901 | 3,558 | 1,657 (1.9×) |
| All-time peak | 2,053 | 3,558 | 1,505 (1.7×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 7.6% | ▲ 19.2% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 0.1% | ▲ 1.4% | — |
| Total visits | 325.6M | 48.8M | 276.8M (6.7×) |
| Visits (24h) | 172.8K | 251.8K | 78.9K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.4M | 1.7M | 324.1K |
| Favorites | 406.5K | 126.5K | 280K (3.2×) |
| Rating | 88.8% | 91.9% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,171 | #714 | of 8,196 |
| Trending score | 12.8 | 43.2 | — |
| Created | Aug 11, 2021 | Jul 19, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Action | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Ohio., 13 for Infinite Nights With Freddy (DOOM).