Ohio. vs [W2] Web Swing for Lucky Blocks
Ohio. currently leads with 1,030 concurrent players against 487, a 2.1× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [W2] Web Swing for Lucky Blocks at 5,224 concurrent players, versus 2,053. Momentum favours Ohio.: -2.2% week over week versus -42.6% for [W2] Web Swing for Lucky Blocks. Lifetime, Ohio. has more visits (325.6M vs 8M). Full side-by-side history for Ohio. and [W2] Web Swing for Lucky Blocks is charted above.
Ohio.
1,030
playing now
1,725 24h peak · 325.6M visits
VS
[W2] Web Swing for Lucky Blocks
487
playing now
942 24h peak · 8M visits
Player count history
Ohio.[W2] Web Swing for Lucky Blocks
Head to head
| Metric | Ohio. | [W2] Web Swing for Lucky Blocks | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,030 | 487 | 543 (2.1×) |
| 24h peak | 1,725 | 942 | 783 (1.8×) |
| 24h average | 1,307 | 689 | 618 (1.9×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,901 | 2,493 | 592 |
| 7-day average | 1,351 | 1,120 | 231 |
| 30-day peak | 1,901 | 3,249 | 1,348 (1.7×) |
| All-time peak | 2,053 | 5,224 | 3,171 (2.5×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 2.9% | ▼ 41.4% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 2.2% | ▼ 42.6% | — |
| Total visits | 325.6M | 8M | 317.6M (40.7×) |
| Visits (24h) | 176.9K | 98.3K | 78.5K (1.8×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.4M | 924.8K | 473.5K (1.5×) |
| Favorites | 406.5K | 687.9K | 281.4K (1.7×) |
| Rating | 88.8% | 97.7% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,342 | #2,057 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | -10.0 | -107.1 | — |
| Created | Aug 11, 2021 | Jun 2, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Action | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Ohio., 13 for [W2] Web Swing for Lucky Blocks.