[Dungeons] GHOUL:// RE vs FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB currently leads with 843 concurrent players against 340, a 2.5Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [Dungeons] GHOUL:// RE at 1,850 concurrent players, versus 1,769. Lifetime, [Dungeons] GHOUL:// RE has more visits (101.9M vs 6.5M). Full side-by-side history for [Dungeons] GHOUL:// RE and FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB is charted above.

[Dungeons] GHOUL:// RE
340
playing now
614 24h peak Β· 101.9M visits
VS
😑 FAST WAVE 😑 X99999999 ETFB
843
playing now
1,598 24h peak Β· 6.5M visits

Player count history

[Dungeons] GHOUL:// REFAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

Head to head

Metric [Dungeons] GHOUL:// RE FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFBDifference
Playing now340843503 (2.5Γ—)
24h peak6141,598984 (2.6Γ—)
24h average4461,023577 (2.3Γ—)
7-day peak1,6111,714103
7-day average3971,188791 (3.0Γ—)
30-day peak1,6111,714103
All-time peak1,8501,76981
24h changeβ–Ό 24.8%β–Ό 9.2%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits101.9M6.5M95.4M (15.8Γ—)
Visits (24h)40.9K153.9K113K (3.8Γ—)
Visits (7d)240.4K729.3K488.8K (3.0Γ—)
Favorites195.5K712.4K516.9K (3.6Γ—)
Rating77.1%81.5%β€”
Global rank (players)#2,021#1,242of 5,937
Trending score30.9-41.0β€”
CreatedAug 31, 2024Apr 24, 2026β€”
GenreRPGSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 8 days for [Dungeons] GHOUL:// RE, 5 for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB.

[Dungeons] GHOUL:// RE vs FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals