[KEN KAGUNE] GHOUL:// RE vs [UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]

[UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] currently leads with 915 concurrent players against 314, a 2.9Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] at 994 concurrent players, versus 561. Lifetime, [KEN KAGUNE] GHOUL:// RE has more visits (101.7M vs 1M). Full side-by-side history for [KEN KAGUNE] GHOUL:// RE and [UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] is charted above.

[KEN KAGUNE] GHOUL:// RE
314
playing now
446 24h peak Β· 101.7M visits
VS
[πŸ”₯UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
915
playing now
994 24h peak Β· 1M visits

Player count history

[KEN KAGUNE] GHOUL:// RE[UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]

Head to head

Metric [KEN KAGUNE] GHOUL:// RE [UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]Difference
Playing now314915601 (2.9Γ—)
24h peak446994548 (2.2Γ—)
24h average357690333 (1.9Γ—)
7-day peak561994433 (1.8Γ—)
7-day average357492135
30-day peak561994433 (1.8Γ—)
All-time peak561994433 (1.8Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 10.5%β–² 36.9%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits101.7M1M100.7M (97.0Γ—)
Visits (24h)29.7K138.9K109.1K (4.7Γ—)
Visits (7d)103.8K328.8K225K (3.2Γ—)
Favorites195.4K5.6K189.8K (35.0Γ—)
Rating77.1%86.8%β€”
Global rank (players)#2,008#1,294of 4,425
Trending score0.0109.0β€”
CreatedAug 31, 2024Jul 29, 2026β€”
GenreRPGStrategyβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for [KEN KAGUNE] GHOUL:// RE, 4 for [UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta].

[KEN KAGUNE] GHOUL:// RE vs [UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals