Gridiron Football 2.0 vs [UGC] Animation Tester

[UGC] Animation Tester currently leads with 17 concurrent players against 3, a 5.7Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Gridiron Football 2.0 at 34 concurrent players, versus 31. Lifetime, Gridiron Football 2.0 has more visits (33.4M vs 24.5M). Full side-by-side history for Gridiron Football 2.0 and [UGC] Animation Tester is charted above.

🏈 Gridiron Football 2.0
3
playing now
31 24h peak Β· 33.4M visits
VS
[UGC] Animation Tester 🎞️
17
playing now
31 24h peak Β· 24.5M visits

Player count history

Gridiron Football 2.0[UGC] Animation Tester

Head to head

Metric Gridiron Football 2.0 [UGC] Animation TesterDifference
Playing now31714 (5.7Γ—)
24h peak3131tie
24h average14195
7-day peak3131tie
7-day average14195
30-day peak3131tie
All-time peak34313
24h changeβ–² 7.7%β€”β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits33.4M24.5M8.9M
Visits (24h)3K2.3K702
Visits (7d)4.1K2.3K1.8K (1.8Γ—)
Favorites109.6K347.6K238K (3.2Γ—)
Rating96.5%90.4%β€”
Global rank (players)#3,816#3,533of 4,425
Trending score0.00.0β€”
CreatedAug 1, 2021Jul 29, 2023β€”
GenreSports & RacingShoppingβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 3 days for Gridiron Football 2.0, 2 for [UGC] Animation Tester.

Gridiron Football 2.0 vs [UGC] Animation Tester β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals