Gridiron Football 2.0 vs Test Emotes

Test Emotes currently leads with 11 concurrent players against 8. On all-time peak the record belongs to Test Emotes at 38 concurrent players, versus 34. Lifetime, Gridiron Football 2.0 has more visits (33.4M vs 6.9M). Full side-by-side history for Gridiron Football 2.0 and Test Emotes is charted above.

🏈 Gridiron Football 2.0
8
playing now
31 24h peak Β· 33.4M visits
VS
Test Emotes
11
playing now
38 24h peak Β· 6.9M visits

Player count history

Gridiron Football 2.0Test Emotes

Head to head

Metric Gridiron Football 2.0 Test EmotesDifference
Playing now8113
24h peak31387
24h average14206
7-day peak31387
7-day average15205
30-day peak31387
All-time peak34384
24h changeβ–Ό 17.6%β–² 0.0%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits33.4M6.9M26.5M (4.9Γ—)
Visits (24h)2.9K4.3K1.4K
Visits (7d)3.9K9.8K6K (2.5Γ—)
Favorites109.6K7.7K101.9K (14.3Γ—)
Rating96.5%80.0%β€”
Global rank (players)#3,681#3,624of 4,380
Trending score-3.50.0β€”
CreatedAug 1, 2021Aug 8, 2025β€”
GenreSports & RacingShoppingβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 3 days for Gridiron Football 2.0, 4 for Test Emotes.

Gridiron Football 2.0 vs Test Emotes β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals