Gridiron Football 2.0 vs Piano Rooms

Gridiron Football 2.0 currently leads with 28 concurrent players against 10, a 2.8Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Gridiron Football 2.0 at 34 concurrent players, versus 28. Lifetime, Gridiron Football 2.0 has more visits (33.4M vs 6.6M). Full side-by-side history for Gridiron Football 2.0 and Piano Rooms is charted above.

🏈 Gridiron Football 2.0
28
playing now
31 24h peak Β· 33.4M visits
VS
Piano Rooms
10
playing now
28 24h peak Β· 6.6M visits

Player count history

Gridiron Football 2.0Piano Rooms

Head to head

Metric Gridiron Football 2.0 Piano RoomsDifference
Playing now281018 (2.8Γ—)
24h peak31283
24h average15132
7-day peak31283
7-day average1515tie
30-day peak31283
All-time peak34286
24h changeβ–Ό 21.1%β–Ό 13.3%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits33.4M6.6M26.8M (5.1Γ—)
Visits (24h)2.7K1.9K839
Visits (7d)3.5K6.6K3K (1.9Γ—)
Favorites109.6K65K44.6K (1.7Γ—)
Rating96.5%84.0%β€”
Global rank (players)#3,402#3,669of 4,380
Trending score0.0-6.8β€”
CreatedAug 1, 2021Sep 11, 2022β€”
GenreSports & RacingEntertainmentβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 3 days for Gridiron Football 2.0, 5 for Piano Rooms.

Gridiron Football 2.0 vs Piano Rooms β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals