[UPD] Dragon Ball Rage vs FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

[UPD] Dragon Ball Rage currently leads with 2,508 concurrent players against 1,236, a 2.0× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD] Dragon Ball Rage at 2,951 concurrent players, versus 1,769. Momentum favours [UPD] Dragon Ball Rage: +4.5% week over week versus -16.1% for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB. Lifetime, [UPD] Dragon Ball Rage has more visits (984.1M vs 7.4M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] Dragon Ball Rage and FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB is charted above.

[UPD] Dragon Ball Rage
2,508
playing now
2,582 24h peak · 984.1M visits
VS
😡 FAST WAVE 😡 X99999999 ETFB
1,236
playing now
1,769 24h peak · 7.4M visits

Player count history

[UPD] Dragon Ball RageFAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

Head to head

Metric [UPD] Dragon Ball Rage FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFBDifference
Playing now2,5081,2361,272 (2.0×)
24h peak2,5821,769813
24h average2,1361,329807 (1.6×)
7-day peak2,8741,7691,105 (1.6×)
7-day average1,8711,093778 (1.7×)
30-day peak2,8741,7691,105 (1.6×)
All-time peak2,9511,7691,182 (1.7×)
24h change 16.7% 13.1%
7d change 4.5% 16.1%
Total visits984.1M7.4M976.8M (133.5×)
Visits (24h)141.1K196.1K55K
Visits (7d)970.8K1.1M157.8K
Favorites2.1M799.3K1.3M (2.6×)
Rating90.5%81.6%
Global rank (players)#823#1,374of 8,199
Trending score46.666.0
CreatedJan 30, 2012Apr 24, 2026
GenreRPGSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for [UPD] Dragon Ball Rage, 10 for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB.