+1 Fire Per Click vs Catalog Emotes Testing

+1 Fire Per Click currently leads with 2,633 concurrent players against 1,954. On all-time peak the record belongs to Catalog Emotes Testing at 6,276 concurrent players, versus 5,907. Lifetime, Catalog Emotes Testing has more visits (32.4M vs 1.4M). Full side-by-side history for +1 Fire Per Click and Catalog Emotes Testing is charted above.

[πŸ”₯] +1 Fire Per Click
2,633
playing now
5,907 24h peak Β· 1.4M visits
VS
Catalog Emotes Testing ✨
1,954
playing now
3,941 24h peak Β· 32.4M visits

Player count history

+1 Fire Per ClickCatalog Emotes Testing

Head to head

Metric +1 Fire Per Click Catalog Emotes TestingDifference
Playing now2,6331,954679
24h peak5,9073,9411,966
24h average3,1512,804347
7-day peak5,9076,161254
7-day average2,9003,363463
30-day peak5,9076,161254
All-time peak5,9076,276369
24h changeβ–² 30.4%β–² 7.9%β€”
7d changeβ€”β–Ό 4.4%β€”
Total visits1.4M32.4M30.9M (22.7Γ—)
Visits (24h)280.7K438.6K157.9K (1.6Γ—)
Visits (7d)444.2K3.6M3.1M (8.0Γ—)
Favorites12.5K262.8K250.4K (21.1Γ—)
Rating99.0%83.5%β€”
Global rank (players)#509#653of 7,213
Trending score30.0-56.9β€”
CreatedJul 7, 2026Jun 4, 2026β€”
GenreSimulationSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 3 days for +1 Fire Per Click, 10 for Catalog Emotes Testing.

+1 Fire Per Click vs Catalog Emotes Testing β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals