【BADGES】NiC: Cold Front vs Would You Rather: Animals Tower
【BADGES】NiC: Cold Front currently leads with 398 concurrent players against 238, a 1.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Would You Rather: Animals Tower at 1,225 concurrent players, versus 610. Momentum favours 【BADGES】NiC: Cold Front: -9.7% week over week versus -68.4% for Would You Rather: Animals Tower. Lifetime, 【BADGES】NiC: Cold Front has more visits (13.9M vs 3.7M). Full side-by-side history for 【BADGES】NiC: Cold Front and Would You Rather: Animals Tower is charted above.
Player count history
Head to head
| Metric | 【BADGES】NiC: Cold Front | Would You Rather: Animals Tower | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 398 | 238 | 160 (1.7×) |
| 24h peak | 461 | 292 | 169 (1.6×) |
| 24h average | 365 | 206 | 159 (1.8×) |
| 7-day peak | 492 | 537 | 45 |
| 7-day average | 355 | 243 | 112 |
| 30-day peak | 492 | 1,170 | 678 (2.4×) |
| All-time peak | 610 | 1,225 | 615 (2.0×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 14.4% | ▲ 15.7% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 9.7% | ▼ 68.4% | — |
| Total visits | 13.9M | 3.7M | 10.2M (3.8×) |
| Visits (24h) | 48.7K | 35.5K | 13.2K |
| Visits (7d) | 369.2K | 347.5K | 21.7K |
| Favorites | 30K | 454.8K | 424.8K (15.2×) |
| Rating | 92.7% | 91.7% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,567 | #3,116 | of 7,786 |
| Trending score | 6.8 | -32.2 | — |
| Created | Sep 7, 2024 | Jun 25, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Strategy | Obby & Platformer | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for 【BADGES】NiC: Cold Front, 12 for Would You Rather: Animals Tower.