【BADGES】NiC: Cold Front vs [] SUMMIT

[] SUMMIT currently leads with 493 concurrent players against 324, a 1.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [] SUMMIT at 661 concurrent players, versus 610. Lifetime, 【BADGES】NiC: Cold Front has more visits (13.6M vs 7.6M). Full side-by-side history for 【BADGES】NiC: Cold Front and [] SUMMIT is charted above.

【BADGES】NiC: Cold Front
324
playing now
481 24h peak · 13.6M visits
VS
[⛰️] SUMMIT
493
playing now
574 24h peak · 7.6M visits

Player count history

【BADGES】NiC: Cold Front[] SUMMIT

Head to head

Metric 【BADGES】NiC: Cold Front [] SUMMITDifference
Playing now324493169 (1.5×)
24h peak48157493
24h average36346097
7-day peak61062111
7-day average38945566
30-day peak61062111
All-time peak61066151
24h change 9.5% 2.7%
7d change
Total visits13.6M7.6M6M (1.8×)
Visits (24h)54.2K54.9K631
Visits (7d)369.2K142.1K227K (2.6×)
Favorites29.5K16.2K13.3K (1.8×)
Rating92.7%79.9%
Global rank (players)#2,293#1,978of 5,807
Trending score-16.12.8
CreatedSep 7, 2024Aug 6, 2025
GenreStrategyAdventure

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 7 days for 【BADGES】NiC: Cold Front, 3 for [] SUMMIT.

【BADGES】NiC: Cold Front vs [] SUMMIT — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals