RODOGRAU 2.0 vs FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB currently leads with 843 concurrent players against 369, a 2.3Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB at 1,769 concurrent players, versus 1,611. Lifetime, RODOGRAU 2.0 has more visits (29.4M vs 6.5M). Full side-by-side history for RODOGRAU 2.0 and FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB is charted above.

RODOGRAU 2.0
369
playing now
1,428 24h peak Β· 29.4M visits
VS
😑 FAST WAVE 😑 X99999999 ETFB
843
playing now
1,598 24h peak Β· 6.5M visits

Player count history

RODOGRAU 2.0FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

Head to head

Metric RODOGRAU 2.0 FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFBDifference
Playing now369843474 (2.3Γ—)
24h peak1,4281,598170
24h average6211,021400 (1.6Γ—)
7-day peak1,6111,714103
7-day average9121,188276
30-day peak1,6111,714103
All-time peak1,6111,769158
24h changeβ–Ό 37.1%β–Ό 9.4%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits29.4M6.5M22.9M (4.5Γ—)
Visits (24h)79.6K152.9K73.4K (1.9Γ—)
Visits (7d)682.7K728.3K45.5K
Favorites477.4K712.4K235K
Rating87.3%81.5%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,926#1,244of 5,937
Trending score-87.0-41.5β€”
CreatedMar 8, 2026Apr 24, 2026β€”
GenreSimulationSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 8 days for RODOGRAU 2.0, 5 for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB.

RODOGRAU 2.0 vs FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals