Don't Steal a VIRAL Squishy vs Borders RTS [v2.0]
Don't Steal a VIRAL Squishy currently leads with 2,970 concurrent players against 79, a 37.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Borders RTS [v2.0] at 3,574 concurrent players, versus 3,483. Lifetime, Don't Steal a VIRAL Squishy has more visits (19.5M vs 11M). Full side-by-side history for Don't Steal a VIRAL Squishy and Borders RTS [v2.0] is charted above.
Don't Steal a VIRAL Squishy
2,970
playing now
3,483 24h peak · 19.5M visits
VS
Borders RTS [v2.0]
79
playing now
180 24h peak · 11M visits
Player count history
Don't Steal a VIRAL SquishyBorders RTS [v2.0]
Head to head
| Metric | Don't Steal a VIRAL Squishy | Borders RTS [v2.0] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 2,970 | 79 | 2,891 (37.6×) |
| 24h peak | 3,483 | 180 | 3,303 (19.4×) |
| 24h average | 2,609 | 111 | 2,498 (23.5×) |
| 7-day peak | 3,483 | 3,494 | 11 |
| 7-day average | 1,754 | 720 | 1,034 (2.4×) |
| 30-day peak | 3,483 | 3,494 | 11 |
| All-time peak | 3,483 | 3,574 | 91 |
| 24h change | ▲ 35.8% | ▼ 9.8% | — |
| 7d change | — | ▲ 344.4% | — |
| Total visits | 19.5M | 11M | 8.5M (1.8×) |
| Visits (24h) | 256.6K | 13.5K | 243.1K (19.0×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1M | 1.2M | 156.5K |
| Favorites | 895.6K | 55.4K | 840.2K (16.2×) |
| Rating | 74.7% | 70.3% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #576 | #3,823 | of 7,970 |
| Trending score | 164.3 | -170.3 | — |
| Created | Apr 26, 2026 | Jan 26, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Strategy | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 7 days for Don't Steal a VIRAL Squishy, 13 for Borders RTS [v2.0].